The Brake Rule - will this rule stifle innovation? Probably
Brakes used to simply stop a vehicle, they are now an important component of an active safety system. Does the new Brake Rule go too far too soon, when in NZ, from what I have read and seen, the major problem is do the brakes work at all?
Trucks are driven fundamentally different to cars, in that that they are almost never driven on their brakes - almost always coasting to a stop, and only being applied in an emergency situation or final stopping. Powerful electromagnetic, or hydraulic, or less common now, exhaust brakes, provide the majority of the retardation required for a heavy motor vehicle (hmv).
The new brake rule was fully implemented on the 1st July 2008 - basically the idea of the rule is that a hmv individually or in combination must be able to stop efficiently whether empty or fully laden. The rule has no grandfather rights, meaning ALL hmv’s modified now must comply with this requirement.
Things such as wheel base alterations will require certification to the brake rule as the amount of weight transferred to the vehicle’s front axle will change under stopping. The difficulty is that in order to achieve certification to the rule, almost all vehicles (if not all) will require either load sensing brakes or ABS - meaning a considerable additional cost when modifying a vehicle. The same will also apply for the fitting of a drawbeam if trailer brake gear does not come as part of the truck package.
From what I have seen, from the 1st Jully the fitment of new drawbeams to old trucks has stopped, so also has wheelbase alteration or axle configuration alterations.
If you are going to purchase a second-hand truck, REALLY IMPORTANT - select a vehicle which is the closest fit to the vehicle that you need - don’t expect, as of right, to be able to alter the vehicle afterwards.
If you plan to modify a truck for whatever reason, VERIFY FIRST that the brakes are able to be set up to comply with requirements. I do not know whether it is possible to fit ABS brakes to all makes & models - I have heard figures of 5k for ABS truck kits, then there is brake relining & certification on top of that.
From our point of view, the cost of certifying a brake modification for a new vehicle with information from the manufacturer is $750 - for a second-hand vehicle, our best estimate is $1500. Based on workflow prior to July 1st, we would have anticipated a couple of wheelbase alterations to old trucks & a few drawbeams fitted to second-hand Japanese imports. Since this date, we have seen several new vehicles, but no inservice vehicles.
What does this all mean? I suspect it means the end of truck modifications as we used to know them.
Truck handling systems, like cars, have become more sophisticated and the vehicle brakes are an active component of the vehicle’s safety system - and this cannot be altered willy nilly.
Whether, when all factors are considered this added compliance burden will be beneficial to the NZ economy as a whole (and, in my view, this is the real question) - I don’t know. I am aware that the most fundamental problem for inservice heavy motor vehicles is whether the brakes operate at all and this has to be addressed first.
Are we simply becoming busier and busier doing things that the world doesn’t care about?? The cynic in me says there is a risk that active vehicle safety systems for trucks will only guarantee that the crashes, when they do occur, will be at worse because they will be at a higher speed. Driver’s have to drive within the vehicle’s limitations and not use these new active safety systems for getting from A to B quicker.
We invite and encourage comments. If you would like to comment on this post - or suggest a new item for discussion, please click on the (No) Comments link below. It’d be great to hear what you are thinking!
Last 5 posts by Nigel
- Adding Value - 6th November, 2008


October 22nd, 2008 at 8:15 am
Hi,
We own a small trucking business, a couple of logging trucks and a couple of tippers. This new rule has made things very difficult for us, as one of our loggers got a bit long in the tooth (but still a good runner) and became not needed, so I stripped the logging gear off and found a fifth wheel for it. That’s the easy part, trying to get certification is a mission, basically the engineer told me to forget about it, it’s to much hassle, I have to get ABS, and spend quite a bit of money to get ABS. Being an older truck we’re not to keen on spending to much money on it. The plan was too put the fifth wheel on it and retire it to off-road forest roading. Being off-road that is no problem, getting the truck to the forest and home again is the problem, 85 km from our base. Some people may say, sell the truck, get another truck that fits your requirements. Which is all well and good for the big companies but the small time operator has to try and make use of what resources they have available. Selling the truck isn’t really an option, first finding a buyer that wants an older truck, and then what is it really worth. As we see it, it’s not worth giving away, but is it worth keeping. What is the LTNZ trying to do, get rid of all the small operators, or just make things a lot more difficult for us. We know we’re not the only one’s in this situation, and hope someone can find a loop hole, for the small time kiwi operator to do what they are so good at doin, making something out of nothing.
Si.